Showing posts with label John Williams. Show all posts
Showing posts with label John Williams. Show all posts

Saturday, July 10, 2010

Empire of the Sun

Steven Spielberg has created a legacy as the ultimate magician of the cinema. His movies have, for the most part, been bright, magical pictures, as is the case here in his 1987 film "Empire of the Sun." With this film, a coming-of-age World War II story, Spielberg indulges in familiar formulas: a lost boy without his parents, a yearning towards reconciliation, a feeling of miraculousness.

Almost always, Spielberg's combination works. Here it does at times, but there is no concrete epicenter, and instead it oversimplifies things and overly-complicates others. "Empire of the Sun" is a movie that often has that Spielberg quality of excellence but more often feels too long, too boring, and even too Spielberg.

A young Christian Bale plays Jamie Graham, the son of wealthy parents living in Shanghai in the 1930s as war breaks out between China and Japan (and the world, of course, for that matter). Jamie is as imaginative and charismatic as he is spoiled and selfish, but he is also quite interested in planes. In fact, it is his toy plane he tries to retrieve which separates him from his family during the chaotic and frightening invasion. Lost, scared, and confused, he returns home where food will run out. Often exactly in the right place, he joins an American sailor named Basie (John Malkovich), and the two develop a friendship, despite Basie constantly betraying him. The two are eventually captured and moved to an internment camp and wait for the war to end.

As mentioned, "Empire of the Sun" is either too complicated or too simple. It is too complicated as it involves an enormous amount of characters which were probably given their proper explanations in the autobiographical novel by J.G. Ballard which the film is based on. There is a doctor, a young Japanese man Jamie befriends, a brutal Japanese captain, an impatient British couple, and parts of Basie's gang which are all practically ignored. It is often too simple, as well. Towards the end of the film, Jamie, now called Jim, witnesses a bright and sudden light approach and push against his body. Instead of allowing reasonably intelligent viewers to ascertain that this is most likely one of the atomic bombings on Japan, Spielberg inserts a radio broadcast to provide exact details of the event. If that still could not suffice, Jamie offers out loud his realization of what has occurred and how he mistook it.

Most of the film is wonderful to look at. It involves dreamlike visuals and another majestic score from John Williams. But at times it feels like another attempt at "E.T.: The Extra-Terrestrial," though it is worth noting that in 1987, Spielberg, along with his 1985 period piece "The Color Purple," was emphasizing his directorial range, shedding the perception that he could only direct children fantasy stories. (Then came "Hook" in 1991, and he would have to wait another two years with "Schindler's List" to finally secure the reputation he deserved and strived for.) Again, at times the quasi-fantastical nature of "Empire of the Sun" feels justified, and at other times it feels gratuitous. It is also noteworthy, though, that Spielberg discussed in interviews about this story being the anti-Peter Pan story in that this is about a boy who has grown up too quickly. And so far, no praise has been given by the reviewer to the performer playing that boy, Christian Bale (the future American Psycho and Batman). It is a very commendable performance, as are the other performers throughout this film (including Ben Stiller, who has said that he first gained the idea for his 2008 film "Tropic Thunder" while making "Empire of the Sun.")

Overall, "Empire of the Sun" has the feel of a inspirational picture that does not exactly inspire the feeling of being inspired. Instead the film drags on; there is a beginning, middle and end, but the middle seems of epic proportion and unjustly too long. It seems that as matter-of-fact as the story could be, it instead chooses to lack a definitive sequence of events. At times it's "Oliver," at other times it's "Stalag 17," and at other times it at least looks like "The Color Purple" but feels like it possesses the youthful optimism of "Hook." It is an interesting hybrid, and another example of his interest in World War II. World War II, a war Spielberg's father fought in, has often been the setting for Spielberg's stories. His first Hollywood attempt at the subject was "1941," then this film in 1987 (ignore the Indiana Jones films for now), and he finally secured a masterpiece with "Saving Private Ryan" (or "Schindler's List" if you prefer to consider that film the "third time's a charm" entity).

Tuesday, January 26, 2010

Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets

File:HP - Harry Potter wordmark.svgNone of the Harry Potter films are finer than the second installment, “Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets.” It is in this film, Chris Columbus’s second and final as the director of the series, that there was an absolute perfect balance of magic, innocence, and darkness. Some of the Harry Potter films before and since were too childish (like “Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone,” the first) or too dark and/or boring (like “Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,” which is, as of early 2010, the most recent). It seems that of the six films so far, it is “Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban” and “Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire” that receive the most appreciation. Along with “The Sorcerer’s Stone,” “The Chamber of Secrets” currently receives the lowest ratings of the films on IMDb. Alfonso CuarĂ³n’s “Prisoner of Azkaban” does come a close second to Columbus’s “Chamber of Secrets” in my opinion, and Mike Newell’s “Goblet of Fire” is exciting yet a bit boring (but was elevated due to Ralph Fiennes’s awesome presence as Voldemort). However, “The Chamber of Secrets” still reigns as the most enjoyable and magical of them all.

Harry Potter, despite a successful first year at Hogwarts School for Witchcraft and Wizardry, is still living in the household of his uncle (Richard Griffiths) and aunt (Fiona Shaw), who proclaim that Harry should be grateful to them for giving him, among other things, their son’s second bedroom. Harry is warned by a house elf named Dobby (voiced by Toby Jones) not to return to school, for there are malevolent plots against him. Harry insists that he return, and is rescued by his friend Ron (Rupert Grint) and Ron's brothers in a flying car. The one who is plotting against Potter is of course the one “whose name must not be spoken”—Voldemort, who appears in the film but not in his snake-like appearance that was later brilliantly portrayed by Fiennes.

The film also saw two new great roles—the incompetent and narcissistic professor Gilderoy Lockhart and Draco Malfoy’s (Tom Felton) sinister father Lucious Malfoy—and two great actors to play the roles, Kenneth Branagh and Jason Isaacs as Lockhart and Malfoy respectively. Lockhart is not at first necessarily a bad person, wishing Harry good luck before he duels with Draco. He seems concerned for the children, at least somewhat, and rushes to help Harry when he is injured. Of course, he is probably doing this to benefit his own reputation, and his magic heals Harry’s injury yet simultaneously turns his arm boneless and flabby. “Ah, yes, well, that can sometimes happen,” he explains. “But the point is you can no longer feel any pain and it’s very clear that the bones are no longer broken.” Much in the Potter films are not initially understood, and so Lockhart therefore has a more cunning background as revealed near the climax of the film. Branagh, the man who diligently and meticulously brought “Hamlet” to full life in 1996, looks like he is having unlimited fun. Isaacs as well, who played the villain in “The Patriot” two years before and later the greatest of them all—Captain Hook in “Peter Pan”—is terrific in the film.

The film series, and the world, would have to say goodbye to Richard Harris, who played Professor Dumbledore in the first two Harry Potter films. Harris died only several weeks before the release of “Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets,” and there was a profound sense of respect and awe for the late Harris and the aurora of his personality in his final performance. He was replaced for the later films by Michael Gambon.

This film works like a great detective story, with John Williams’ eerie music accompanying a group of spiders that exits the stage as each victim is “petrified.” The events are not clear to Harry or the audience at this point, but students are being petrified, or stunned, by an apparent monster hidden in the secret Chamber of Secrets, which was established by the wizard Salazar Slytherin. Slyhterin believed the school should be more selective of which students were accepted. Because of this, Harry and his friends believe that Malfoy and his family are up to it. Harry also discovers the diary of a Tom Malvo Riddle, and the diary can communicate with him. It visualizes for Harry the mysterious events that took place fifty years ago at Hogwarts. In this episode, Harry sees the mysterious Tom Riddle (Christian Coulson), whose fate is later explained.

Williams’ score demonstrates the master at his best. There is his theme for Dumbledore’s bird, named Fawkes the phoenix, a bird that can literally be reborn from the ashes. Williams was very busy and due to scheduling conflicts was not able to deliver a fully-developed score, so the assistance of William Ross was needed to finish the score and orchestrate it. The post-“Prisoner of Azkaban” films do not feature Williams’ score, though the succeeding composers were able to understand the need to use Williams’ “Hedwig Theme”—so vital to the Harry Potter films. The cinematography by Roger Pratt helps make this a very beautiful film. It is dark when it needs to be and also bright to make sure there is a payoff. Columbus allows everything to be an improvement over the previous film—even the Qudditch match is more entertaining.

“Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets” is filmmaking at its best. Films of the fantasy genre often try too hard or simply not hard enough to establish an environment of magic in their films. “Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets” finds the total perfect balance, and despite its near-three hour length, there is hardly ever a boring moment or a scene that should have been discarded. What a wonderful film it is.