I agree with them that the woods during
Halloween are haunting enough. Burkittsville (a real-life town of about 150 people) according to our
student filmmakers (Heather Donahue, Michael C. Williams, and Joshua Leonard), used to be known as Blair. A small
cemetery contains an unusually high number of dead children. Some of
them, we are told, were murdered by an insane man who kidnapped them
and killed them two-by-two with an ax, with one looking away in the
corner. He eventually entered the town and declared, “I'm finally
finished.” His reason? A witch was torturing him and told him she would stop if he killed the children. There are several other scary stories like this sprinkled
throughout the exposition. One of them is the story of the Blair
Witch, a local legend grandparents used to tell their children to
scare them to bed early. Mary Brown, an older woman the town has
written off as crazy, tells our three protagonists a story of how
when she was a young girl fishing with her father, a woman who
appeared to be completely covered with hair approached her. Because
the three filmmakers note that Mary Brown also claims to be a
scientist doing research for the government, they ignore her ominous
story and drive off for the woods. There, they meet two fisherman,
one of whom describes the story of Robin Weaver, an unfortunate soul who vanished,
apparently caused by an old woman--or witch--whose feet never touched the ground.
These stories are eerie enough and
would make a fine film of their own, but they're not particularly
scary. “The Blair Witch Project,” however, is truly scary.
Influenced by other horror films (its utilization of both color and
black-and-white is reminiscent of “Night of the Living Dead” and the more obvious similarity is to "Cannibal Holocaust") and
obviously influential (with the most obvious influence being on
“Paranormal Activity” and a host of other horror films), it might be considered one of the best of all time. While not as scary as "Paranormal Activity," it certainly is more real-looking. Perhaps the reason is that, like "Jaws" before it, our witch is never seen (or is it?). Instead, we are witness to our characters being woken at night to the sound of silent cackles. There are piles of rocks mysteriously placed outside their tent. Their map goes missing. One morning, there appears to be slime surrounding the tent. The camera can barely pick it up, but who cares? It's much scarier to simply take their word for it. In fact, hardly anything can often be seen, and this works mostly to the directors' (Daniel Myrick and Eduardo Sanchez) favor. The movie is so simple yet brilliant because it rests on our shared phenomenon of being scared in the woods at night. Add a witch and I can't even imagine.
While the three actors are not necessarily bad, the constant improvisation leads to overacting. There's an incessant amount of shouting at each other as they argue their way into madness, constantly being hunted by a witch seen, not heard. Josh teases Heather about the camera, telling her it's not quite reality. Well, for one, it's hardly realistic that a group of characters in such dire situations would continue filming, or that they would have moments of levity and laughter in their breaks from being hunted. The reality of things like witches I'm sure will be debated for centuries, but if such creatures do exist, it can be concluded that they probably lack any sense of compassion or mercy. If there are witches, they are probably more like the Blair Witch than Harry Potter.
Hungry, cold and hunted, the three continue to do their best to crawl out of the vast woods, but to no avail. There is an absolutely terrifying climax in a house deep, deep in the woods. It's impossible to see what exactly is going on, but it's hauntingly eerie. Handprints everywhere and a silent scream somewhere in the foods. How I would hate to be alone in the woods, hunted by a witch. Terrifying.
0 comments:
Post a Comment