Showing posts with label Harrison Ford. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Harrison Ford. Show all posts

Friday, December 18, 2015

Star Wars: The Force Awakens

There has been an awakening...have you felt it? Those words, terrifyingly spoken by a character we know now to be Snoke, were the introductory lines we heard right after Thanksgiving 2014 in the first of three terrific trailers for the first Star Wars film in a decade (not including the not-so-well-received animated film from 2008) and the one featuring most of the original stars since 1983. Fans have indeed felt it: Episode VII made more than $14 million dollars alone in its first day of release, and it will undoubtedly be the film of the year in that sense. But does it deservedly rank as the single greatest Star Wars film ever, as Rotten Tomatoes claims? That's a bit more complicated.

By now many fans know that producer Kathleen Kennedy, George Lucas' hand-picked choice to lead Lucasfilm in the post-Lucas era, convinced J. J Abrams, the man who helped reboot the Star Trek franchise and who initially turned down the chance to direct The Force Awakens, to direct it when she asked him, "Who is Luke Skywalker?" Luke (Mark Hamill) does appear, as does his sister Leia (Carrie Fisher), but of the three original stars, Han Solo (Harrison Ford) appears the most (and receives top billing), but even he takes a bit of a back seat to the three newer protagonists: Rey, Finn, and Poe Dameron. So the makers deserve enormous credit for bringing back the original three plus, Anthony Daniels as C-3PO and Peter Mayhew as Chewbacca, but also credibility for assembling an incredible list of some of the most talented newer actors: John Boyega, Oscar Isaac, Daisy Ridley (in her film debut as Rey, the lead), Lupita Nyong'o, Gwendoline Christie, Domhnall Gleeson, Adam Driver, and Andy Serkis. Filling out the acting list is Swedish legend Max von Sydow and Abrams' frequent collaborator Simon Pegg. Even if The Force Awakens were a bad movie, it would be worth seeing it simply to see all these actors.

The Force Awakens takes place decades after the Empire fell in The Return of the Jedi. Out of the Empire's ashes comes the First Order, an authoritarian government in conflict with the Republic and its only Jedi, Luke Skywalker. Skywalker, however, goes into a bit of a depression after a particularly tragic failure and goes into a self-imposed exile. Poe Dameron (Oscar Isaac) is sent on a mission to retrieve part of a map to Skywalker but is hunted by the First Order's Kylo Ren (Adam Driver), a Darth Vader "fan-boy", and General Hux (Dumhnall Gleeson), two sort of sibling rivals for the love and attention of the mysterious Dark Side leader Snoke (Andy Serkis). In a powerful opening sequence, Stormtrooper FN-2187 (played by John Boyega and renamed Finn) goes into a Saving Private Ryan-style state of shock and has had enough of the First Order's violence. After Kyle Ren captures Poe in an attempt to retrieve the map to hunt down Skywalker, Finn breaks out with Poe and escapes to the desert planet Jakku, where they become separated. Poe's droid BB-8 survives the hunt and finds Rey (Daisy Ridley), a talented scavenger, and eventually Finn, and then the three of them become hunted by the First Order. They escape in the only "piece of junk" ship they can find: the Millennium Falcoln. But it's original owners (you know who) want it back, and sure enough they are successful. As you can see, while this movie contains maybe a bit too many parallels to the original trilogy, it's a complex but not too crowded and complicated story line and an exciting one.  

The author of a Lucas biography, Dale Pollock, is just about the only person who has read the outlines for all nine of Lucas' original stories and has said that this trilogy is the best. But as Vanity Fair reported earlier this year, Disney (the new owner of Lucasfilm) and Kennedy decided to go in a different direction. It would be interesting to see just how different Lucas' version and the final version are, but my hunch is that going back to the genesis of these stories, our original heroes were always meant to be supporting roles in this trilogy. Hamill even hinted at this in an interview with Gene Siskel back in the 80s promoting The Return of the Jedi.

There are a lot of grand moments here. The reunion of Han and Leia, separated and not particularly interested in each other anymore, is a powerful and touching moment, one of the best in the film. But there was one scene in particular that made me fairly angry. It's a scene that is executed with enough gravitas and emotion to be an impressive one, but it's one that left me disturbed and puzzled. That's sort of the basic element of this movie: it's so well-crafted that it's difficult to dislike, but it's not a masterpiece. To use Star Wars vernacular, Abrams has learned much, but he is not a Jedi yet. The Force Awakens may not look as breathtakingly fresh as those first films from 1977-1983, but it still looks like much more painstaking effort was put into it than the films from 1999-2005 were. Still, while The Force Awakens is far superior to The Phantom Menace or Attack of the Clones, I couldn't help but like Revenge of the Sith better, though I suspect I'm in the minority. But here's one aspect that I think most folks will agree with me: the villains here are not nearly as interesting as Star Wars villains of the past. A Star Wars movie is sometimes as strong as its villains, and whereas the films of old featured Darth Vader, Emperor Palpatine, Grand Moff Tarkin, Boba Fett, Jabba the Hutt, Darth Maul, and Count Dooku, the strongest villain here (Kylo Ren) is essentially Vader-light, with his only truly impressive moments being his frightening temper tantrums. The Palpatine-like character is Snoke, in another motion-capture performance by Serkis (who appeared in similarly filmed roles in The Lord of the Rings, King Kong, The Adventures of Tintin, and the Planet of the Apes films). (Serkis' company, The Imaginarium Studios, which focuses on motion-capture film making, has provided consultation for Godzilla, The Avengers: Age of Ultron, and The Force Awakens.) But despite how impressive the technology has looked in some of the movies mentioned, Serkis gives Snoke a menacing voice but a visual that looks dated and not consistent with the tenacity of the rest of the film. While Snoke looks silly, the rest of the film has a look of determination. Abrams and team deliver on their promise to feature more sets, practical effects, make-up design, and puppetry, using what seems to be a limited amount of computer-generated imagery. What CGI that does appear is mostly well-done by Industrial Light & Magic.    

But all in all, there were only three moments in this film that made me completely thrilled: the first time we see Han and Chewie, the first time we see Leia, and the first time we see Luke. Some moments, though, are actually funny, with Boyega, Isaac, and Ford providing most of the humor. Finn enthusiastically hopes to storm the enemy's base with no plan. When confronted by Solo on this lack of preparation, Finn excitedly tells him that they will use the Force. Solo is not impressed. "That's not how the Force works," he grumpily tells him. C-3PO (with a red arm for some reason) and R2D2 appear, but BB-8 does more than a fine job standing in as the new it-droid; he even gives Finn a thumbs up, certifying audiences' love for him with his puppy-dog eyes and WALL-E characteristics. The droid was created by Disney Research to be a practical part of interacting with the actors, and he is part of the unique combination of characters new and old, a combination that got just the right amount. And this movie is a sign that perhaps the times are a-changin', because The Force Awakens is a Star Wars movie with a feminist bent: it's the first time we see a woman fight with a lightsaber, Princess Leia is now General Leia, and there's even a lady Stormtrooper (Captain Phasma, played by Game of Thrones star Gwendoline Christie).

I'm shifting back and forth between criticism and praise, so let me be clear: This is a good movie. Abrams' team (especially the production designers Rick Carter and Darren Gilford, costume designer Michael Kaplan, and creature-shop head Neal Scanlan) have created a Star Wars movie that more or less looks like what a Star Wars movie should look like, shunning the excessive CGI of a decade ago.

But is this the best Star Wars movie ever? No. Is it even the third of fourth best? No to that as well. But by my count, there will be a total of about 20 Star Wars movies (three trilogies plus three stand-alone films to be released within several years, as well as about six spin-offs and specials, including the infamous Holiday Special), so fifth best out of about 20, I assume, ain't bad. Ultimately, if you like Star Wars, you will like The Force Awakens, and I am confident that the next two will be entertaining escapism as well. The Force is strong with this one.        

Tuesday, December 25, 2012

Some Recommendations of Some (Less Seen) Christmas Movies

The Shop Around the Corner

File:Shop-Around-the-Corner.jpgThis is probably the best Christmas movie you've never seen (and by "you," I mean people younger than forty). Modern audiences would recognize the similarities between this movie and its remake, "You've Got Mail" (notice the name of Meg Ryan's shop in the latter), but this one is far superior. James Stewart is a clerk at a store, and he's stressing from the dual difficulties of quarreling with his new colleague (Margaret Sullivan) and coming under suspicion from his manager (Frank Morgan). As you can guess from the similarities between the two movies, Stewart and Sullivan's characters are also carrying on a pen-pal writing romance while being unaware of each other's identity. While "The Shop Around the Corner" is hardly a Christmas movie (neither is "It's a Wonderful Life," for that matter), it's charming, eloquent, simple, remarkable, and humorous.  Frank Morgan's lines are even more lump-in-the-throat-inducing than his lines are in "The Wizard of Oz."

The Bishop's Wife
Also remade in the 90s (as "The Preacher's Wife" with Denzel Washington and Whitney Houston), this is the other 1940s Christmas movie about a man in need of an angel.  Like "It's a Wonderful Life" and "The Shop Around the Corner," the movie combines the blissful atmosphere of the holidays with bitter resentment due to stress, anxiety, and economics. As a matter of fact, sometimes it relies a bit too much of the former instead of the latter; Cary Grant, who's perfect in this movie, rarely does not smile in the movie. His tone is not wittingly and loftily dismissive as it is in some of his more famous roles; here it is constantly rising, expressing confidence as an angel sent to help a bishop (David Niven) re-discover what is important in life.  Despite its over-reliance on cheer, it's a wonderful and highly enjoyable movie nonetheless.

Rare Exports
From Finland, this is the most surreal Christmas movie I have ever seen. I can't recall if the movie explored the mythological figure of the Tomte, but the movie does center on a sort of mythical, un-Santa-like imagining of the famous figure. Taking place in a mining town in rural Finland, Santa makes his rounds, this time to provoke chaos and danger instead of the usual niceties. Truly, this movie is difficult to explain; the surrealism mixed with the horror of it all perhaps is an acquired taste, but ultimately it's a recommendable film.

Babes in Toyland
File:Babes.in.Toyland.publicity.still.jpgThe most famous adaptation of the 1903 Victor Herbert operetta, in some respects the 1934 "Babes in Toyland" feels ahead of its time.  While its production value seems inferior, Charlotte Henry as Little Bo-Beep is reminiscent of Snow White, Felix Knight looks and sounds like Robin Hood, Toyland looks similar to Oz, and in many ways it also captures some of what came before it: Henry Brandon reminded me of the ghoulish characters of German Expressionism, and the film makes use of Disney's theme for the Three Little Pigs when they show up (along with a mouse that resembles Mickey).  But it is first and foremost a Laurel and Hardy movie, and they are especially charming and humorous here. Comedic giants in a nice ensemble, they have numerous effective moments of humor, like trying to trick the villain Silas Barnaby by giving him a Christmas present in July. Santa Claus also shows up at one point to pick up the toy soldiers he ordered, which are far too big (but come in handy later for an exciting climax). One final note: Roger Ebert has commented that there is no comparison between the use of color and black-and-white cinematography in movies. He argues that black-and-white movies appear timeless, whereas color looks awkward.  The analogy he gives is asking his readers to compare the wedding photographs of their parents and grandparents: the grandparents are in black and white and look timeless, while the parents are in color and look goofy.  I generally don't agree with him (in terms of black and white versus color), but he's correct here: If you have a choice, pick the original black-and-white version, even for children. Children completely lack any prejudice towards black-and-white movies or towards any older movie or even silent films.  Instead, they're totally mesmerized by them, as they should be. It's only when they grow older that they develop ignorant views on the subject.


The Star Wars Holiday Special
"If I had the time and a sledgehammer, I would track down every copy of that special and smash it."    -George Lucas

This may be the king of all "it's-so-bad-it's-good" movies. This movie is awful and yet so awesome to watch. Just imagine, fans of "Star Wars," that after six movies, that animated show that children seem to like, and the recent announcement of the Disney purchase with three more movies on the way, and all that other stuff, that there in fact remains one more hardly-watched adventure of our beloved characters. A movie like this is one of those rare movies that nearly renders me speechless because it's so difficult to put everything so bizarre about it in print. The plot: Han Solo, Princess Leia, Luke Skywalker and gang all help Chewbakka get back to his home planet (where he apparently has a wife, child and father) in time for Life Day (strikingly similar to Christmas).  But our main stars sacrifice most of their appearance for 1970s television stars: Bea Arthur (who sings to the tune of the Cantina theme), Art Carney, and Harvey Korman.  Harvey...Korman. If you thought Jar Jar Binks was the most annoying "Star Wars" character, you haven't seen Harvey Korman in "The Star Wars Holiday Special." This movie tries to take what worked so well with "Star Wars" and turns into a farcical mess. At one point it's arbitrarily a cartoon (making it the first appearance of legendary character Boba Fett), or it's a sitcom, and never is it (intentionally) entertaining. Did I mention it's also a musical? Honestly, there are few movie-watching experiences as surreal as watching "The Star Wars Holiday" special. Conan O'Brien once played a clip for Harrison Ford and his reaction was priceless.


"You was here...and you was smoochin' with my brotha!"



Movies, movies, theater, cinema, watch, watching, watches, view,  see, saw, cinema,  film, flick, motion picture, Wizard of Oz, James Stewart, Jimmy Stewart, Cary Grant, Shop Around the Corner, Bishop's Wife, Star Wars, Holiday Special, You've Got Mail, Laurel and Hardy, Harrison Ford, Conan O'Brien